Reconstruction 45% Over Budget

(Greenburgh, NY) -- County Legislator Tom Abinanti (D-Greenburgh) today called on Westchester County to sell 450 Saw Mill River Road in Greenburgh, the building which the County purchased just a year and a half ago to house voting machines.

Abinanti’s move comes amid reports that building renovations are 45% over budget. It also follows today’s authorization by the Board of Acquisition and Contract for the new administration of County Executive Rob Astorino to rebid some of the remaining work for which it has rejected bids.

“Those of us who opposed purchasing the building said the cost estimates were too low, the building had mold and asbestos, the roof needed to be replaced not repaired,  - and we’ve been proved right,” said Legislator Abinanti.  “The operating costs will be far too expensive. Transporting machines around the County from that location is geographically extremely difficult.”

Earlier this week, the Public Works Department revealed to the Board of Legislators that the cost of the renovation project was $3.3 million more than the $6.8 million budget - for a total $10.1 million. The Department said that the additional cost would not be bonded but financed with a loan from the New York Power Authority to be paid back monthly from energy “savings” from the newly installed state of the art energy-efficient heating and cooling systems which replaced systems the Department had originally claimed would not need to be replaced.

The purchase of the building has been fraught with controversy. Former County Executive Andrew Spano administration’s purchase followed more than a year of controversy over whether the County should purchase the building.  There have been several complaints by workers in a neighboring business during construction of airborne contaminants which affected their breathing and caused damage to their vehicles.

“This building is nothing but trouble,” said Abinanti, ”we need to cut our losses and sell the building.”

(White Plains, NY) – On the first anniversary of the allocation of American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) funding, Westchester County Board of Legislators Chairman Ken Jenkins (D-Yonkers) today thanked our state and Congressional delegations for securing more than $552 million in aid to Westchester County.  “The ARRA was an extraordinary response to a crisis unlike anything our generation has witnessed. This critical legislation provided significant funding for fiscal relief, as well as for infrastructure and environmental projects, direct benefits to low income and unemployed residents” said Jenkins. “With $31 billion being allocated for programs that directly impact our State, Westchester has been able to secure more than $552 million for local projects, with many underway.”

Jenkins further commented "As we head towards warmer weather and construction season,  Westchester residents will see the construction phases of Westchester ARRA projects.  These investments are important get people back to work and improve our local economies.  While the County Board continues to work with all of our government partners to find efficiencies that reduce the cost of government, we must not lose focus on the need to invest in the infrastructure of Westchester." Highlights of Westchester’s allocation and projects are:

Infrastructure:
About $59.8 million has been allocated for county infrastructure projects, including:

  • Upgrades along the Bronx River Parkway, the Popham Road Bridge in Scarsdale, the Odell Avenue Bridge in Yonkers, the South First Avenue Bridge in Mount Vernon and bridges along the Interstate 684
  • System upgrades for traffic and pedestrian signal equipment, traffic detectors, repaving of the southbound lanes of the Taconic State Parkway, pavement overlay of Route 123 in Rye and an automated traffic management system on the Cross County Parkway

Employment & Jobs:
Roughly $169 million in Workforce Improvement Act (WIA) funding has been allocated to New York, with Westchester receiving $3.18 million, specifically:

  • $544,000 allocated for adult employment and job training
  • $1 million allocated for dislocated worker employment and training
  • $948,000 allocated for summer youth employment programs

Aid to Families in Need:
Westchester received more than $191.3 million for temporary benefits, with direct payments to individuals through a combination of Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) and Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) grants, which included:

  • $162.8 million in extended unemployment insurance
  • More than $27.2 million allocated for increased food stamps
  • $1.3 million in increased Pell grants to college students
  • $3 million in Emergency Fund for Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Program
  • $2.37 million in Project-Based Rental Assistance (Section 8)

Clean Water & Clean Air:
Westchester received more than $58.3 million in funding for environmental and energy projects, including:

  • $43.8 million for clean water,  drinking  water  and  wastewater  projects, such as construction of the collection system and treatment plant in North Salem and nitrogen removal and other upgrades at the Mamaroneck Wastewater Treatment Facility
  • $8.6 million towards Energy Efficiency Conservation Block Grants through conservation and renewable energy projects
  • $5.9 million towards weatherization projects

The County Board, through its oversight, continues to monitor the progress of these projects are fulfilling the requirements and are creating jobs for people in Westchester.

(White Plains, NY) – The Westchester County Board of Legislators Special Committee on Health Insurance Savings presented their final recommendation for a health insurance proposal that would require all non-represented County employees make a contribution towards their care.  The recommendation has been sent to the Board’s Committee on Budget & Appropriations for a complete fiscal analysis prior to a vote by the full Board.  Chaired by the Board’s Vice-Chairman, Legislator Lyndon Williams (D-Mount Vernon) and the Board’s Majority Whip, Legislator Judy Myers (D-Larchmont), the Committee’s initial goal was to reach out to stakeholders who would be most affected by changes in the existing county plan as well as persons with knowledge and expertise on the proposed changes. If adopted, this proposal will take effect on July 1, 2010. “This legislation is intended to be a first step towards phasing-in the equitable contributions toward health care by all County employees,” said Vice-Chairman Williams. “The Committee moved expeditiously to provide a workable plan that considered all stakeholders in balancing the important need for taxpayer relief while allowing for fairness to county employees,” said Vice-Chairman Williams.

This compromise legislation presented at today’s meeting would require that all elected officials, County officers and officials appointed for a fixed term (flat-rate employees), certain non-represented County employees and retirees to contribute between five per cent (5%) and fifteen (15%) of the overall cost of the premium health insurance. Majority Whip Myers said that “given the scope an dcomplexity of the entire health benefit arena, as well as the need to develop a plan for increased savings now, this interim plan serves as a short-term solution.”  The proposal creates a tier-system of contribution based upon years of service:

Categories of County Employees

Amount of Contribution

All County elected officials (District Attorney, members of the Board of Legislators, County Clerk, County Executive), County officers and officials appointed for a fixed term (Commissioners, Department/Agency heads and flat rate employees)

Fifteen per cent (15%)

All non-represented County employees and retirees who have less than 0 – 5 years of County service

Fifteen per cent (15%)

All non-represented County employees and retirees who have between 5 – 10 years of County service

Ten per cent (10%)

All non-represented County employees and retirees who have between 10 – 20 years of County service

Five per cent (5%)

All non-represented County employees and retirees who have 20+ years of County service

Zero per cent (0%)

Beyond the near-term savings from a revised contributory plan, the committee intends to pursue permanent long-term savings by conducting a comprehensive analysis of all existing plans that would save Westchester taxpayers millions of dollars. Vice-Chairman Lyndon Williams said that the next phase is for the Committee to continue to meet with health insurance professionals and key industry experts to assess and develop a long-term health benefit plan that works best for Westchester County.  “We all agree that the county’s health plan should provide for employees contributions. However, changes to the plan should be implemented in a thoughtful and orderly manner with a view to best quality coverage at the lowest costs.  This cannot be achieved by simply pulling numbers out of a hat that might not materialize in the long run.”

COMMITTEE BACKGROUND

The Committee was established by Board Chairman Ken Jenkins (D-Yonkers) to analyze and make recommendations on the fairest and most cost-effective way for the County to provide quality and affordable health care access to its employees at reduced costs.  The first meeting was held on Saturday, February 6th when the committee agreed on a work plan for coming up with legislation for county employees’ contributions to their health insurance plan.

The committee held another meeting on February 16th, where they brought together Westchester County District Attorney Janet DiFiore, Finance Commissioner Anne Marie Berg and POMCO representatives for input on the fairest and most economically feasible manner the County could achieve some interim savings for taxpayers while continuing to provide its quality coverage to its employees.

The Westchester County District Attorney told the committee that her office will be disproportionately impacted by the County Executive’s proposed plan, which would require to all non-union employees pay 15% of the estimated costs of the County’s insurance expense. The DA pointed that of the 377 of employees affected by the proposed plan, 125 of them are county prosecutors, who have not received even a cost-of-living increase since 2005.  The District Attorney said that while her office was disproportionately impacted, she was not consulted on the County Executive’s proposal.  The District attorney made it clear that she was not opposed to a contributory plan being enacted, given the current economic climate, but would appreciate sensible thoughtful process that considers the unintended consequences that could result.

County Finance Commissioner Ann Marie Berg discussed the existing plan as administered currently by POMCO. She confirmed that contrary to the impression given to the public that county employees do not pay for health insurance coverage, some county employees do pay part of the costs for their health coverage. Berg also clarified on the record that the $22,000 costs of family coverage on which the County Executive’s savings were based is erroneous.  She said that the “$22,000 is the overall cumulative costs of the POMCO family plan, which includes HMO, Medicare Part B, dental and vision plans,” said Commissioner Berg.  According to records, the baseline cost of a family plan that the County pays for health coverage only under the POMCO contract for County employees is only $19,500.

Jennifer Zando, Director of Account Management and Vanessa Flynn, Vice President of Client Services of POMCO briefed the Committee on its current plan with the County.  They explained that Westchester County used to have a fully insured plan with Empire Blue Cross Blue Shield as its insurance carrier. The County determined that it would be more cost-effective for the County to be self-insured. It then changed from Empire to a self-insured plan administered by POMCO as the 3rd party administrator. They informed the Committee that the current plan already contained a ‘working spouse’ exclusion, which prevents a working spouse from using the POMCO plan as a primary source of insurance.

POMCO representatives indicated that they provide the County regular reports on ways to save money on health insurance. The Committee requested copies of the reports be forwarded to the Legislature on a regular basis.  The Committee also requested that POMCO provide a various plan comparisons and recommendations for alternative for non-represented employees.

Click here to view Draft Legislation

Board Chairman Jenkins on Astorino Sick Day Proposal

2/11/2010 6:17:37 PM

Westchester County Board Chairman Ken Jenkins today issued the following statement in response to Westchester County Executive Rob Astorino’s proposal calling for new limits of payouts for unused sick and vacation pay for County employees. 

 

“It’s somewhat strange that the County Executive would craft legislation for a policy that he can implement today through an executive order.  All of the commissioners, department heads and supervisors appointed by the County Executive have ultimate control in managing their agencies and departments as they see fit.  It’s a bit disingenuous that he would make this a matter of legislation, rather than a simple policy change under his Administration.” 

 

“The current policy, which was implemented under County Executive Andrew O’Rourke, encourages exemplary attendance of our full-time employees. The current policy provided an incentive for employees to not use sick time and encourage consistent attendance, by compensating employees half of the amount accrued with a cap on the amount of hours.” 

 

“The County Board would strongly recommend that a policy change of this magnitude should be phased in and implemented immediately for new employees. There are significant productivity issues that the Administration might want to considered.  Again, this is a management issue and we encourage the County Executive to issue an executive order today.”  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2/11/2010 6:20:25 PM

Westchester County Board Chairman Ken Jenkins today issued the following statement in response to the news of the rejection of the County’s implementation plan by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development and to the federal monitor overseeing the county’s compliance with last year’s settlement of the fair and affordable housing lawsuit.  The settlement was in response to a lawsuit brought against Westchester County by the Anti-Discrimination Center (ADC), accusing the county of making false statements on federal applications about its efforts to integrate housing. 

“We have received notification regarding the implementation plan.  The federal monitor found some discrepancies in the submitted plan. The monitor identified some items that must be resolved”.  

“We are confident that the Administration will be able to work out these issues.”